Data governance and privacy-by-design frameworks (GDPR/HIPAA) in multi-cloud data pipelines

Main Article Content

Moyosoluwa Awodire

Abstract

The speed at which multi-cloud architecture has permeated the enterprise data management landscape has fundamentally
changed the game in scalability, resilience, and operational flexibility. But sharing information across multiple cloud
services also poses challenges in governance, regulatory compliance, privacy, and secure information exchange. In this
study, the data governance and privacy-by-design approaches that enable compliance with key data protection laws, such
as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA),
in Multi-cloud data pipelines are explored. The study examines various governance concepts, such as data classification,
metadata management, data lineage, policy enforcement, access control, encryption, auditing, and ongoing compliance
monitoring. It also reviews the impact of designing privacy into the data lifecycle a minimize security risks while ensuring
data integrity, availability, and accountability. Automated compliance validation, intelligent metadata management, and
privacy-preserving controls are proposed in a single governance model that can be integrated into heterogeneous cloud
environments. It also includes AI-enabled monitoring and cloud-native security mechanisms to enhance governance
effectiveness and prepare for regulation. The results validate the benefits of governance automation, such as greater
transparency, reduced compliance risks, secure data sharing, and improved operational efficiency in enterprise Multi-cloud
environments. The research offers actionable advice for organizations aiming to create resilient, compliant, and sustainable
cloud data management practices to meet the changing regulatory and technological needs.

Article Details

How to Cite

Data governance and privacy-by-design frameworks (GDPR/HIPAA) in multi-cloud data pipelines. (2025). Journal of Data Analysis and Critical Management, 1(02), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.64235/z44bfn53